LESSWRONG
LW

746
Wikitags

Epistemic Spot Check

Edited by Yoav Ravid, et al. last updated 28th Oct 2022

Epistemic Spot Checks is a technique for figuring out the value of a learning resource (usually a book). You can't fact check every single claim in a book, that takes too long. There's a certain amount of trust the reader has to give the author. But how does one know whether an author deserves that trust? Using the Epistemic Spot Checks technique, which Elizabeth created, you read the very beginning of the book (usually a few pages to chapter), take a few claims, and fact check them. If there are too many mistakes in the first pages, you can expect the rest to be the same, if the there are little to no mistakes (especially on something you expected to turn out false), then that author at least gained a few points.

See also: Epistemic Review, Scholarship & Learning

Subscribe
Discussion
2
Subscribe
Discussion
2
Posts tagged Epistemic Spot Check
45Why Yudkowsky is wrong about "covalently bonded equivalents of biology"
titotal
2y
41
122What Comes After Epistemic Spot Checks?
Elizabeth
6y
9
39How’s that Epistemic Spot Check Project Coming?
Elizabeth
6y
16
173Did Christopher Hitchens change his mind about waterboarding?
Isaac King
1y
24
313Epistemic Legibility
Elizabeth
4y
30
46The Urgency of Normal: An Exercise in Bounded Distrust
Zvi
4y
3
84Can we hold intellectuals to similar public standards as athletes?
ozziegooen
5y
48
72“Eating Dirt Benefits Kids” is Basically Made Up
Elizabeth
4y
13
55A question about Eliezer
perpetualpeace1
13y
160
33Epistemic spot checking one claim in The Precipice
Isaac King
2y
3
22Review: Martyr Made Podcast
Elizabeth
4y
0
81Epistemic Spot Check: The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance
Elizabeth
6y
9
72How accurate is the quantum physics sequence?
Paul Crowley
13y
68
43Epistemic Spot Check: The Dorito Effect (Mark Schatzker)
Elizabeth
7y
8
39Epistemic Spot Check: The Fate of Rome (Kyle Harper)
Elizabeth
6y
3
Load More (15/24)
Add Posts