LESSWRONG
LW

1121
Wikitags

Fairness

Edited by Yoav Ravid last updated 27th Aug 2021

Fairness is a property of a system or process where no part is privileged, along some measure. A common problem is how to divide a cake between 3 people. Should every one get a third? what if one of them is hungrier? What if they don't agree about what is fair? This is an example of fair division. 

Talking about fairness is difficult, as it runs into many problems with language (as surely the first sentence in this page does). What does privilege mean? what does it mean for someone to be entitled to something?

It also runs it problems of value. How do we measure value? is value objective or subjective? How do we know how much value something is worth to someone? Should an arbiter decide or can people decide between themselves?

Objective value is considered impossible, so objective fairness is considered impossible too. Which means an arbiter can't be used, and participants have to find a arrangement which is subjectively fair to them.

Which opens up problems of truthfulness, strategy and verification.

Several posts on LessWrong deal with this topic, and it's also a field of research called Fair Division.

Related pages:

  • Game Theory
  • Voting Theory
  • Economics

External links:

  • Wikipedia: Fairness 
  • Wikipedia: Fair division 
  • Wikipedia: List of unsolved problems in fair division 
Subscribe
Discussion
1
Subscribe
Discussion
1
Posts tagged Fairness
20Notes on Fairness
David Gross
5y
4
62Fair Division of Black-Hole Negentropy: an Introduction to Cooperative Game Theory
Wei Dai
16y
37
58The Bedrock of Fairness
Eliezer Yudkowsky
17y
103
25The Bedrock of Morality: Arbitrary?
Eliezer Yudkowsky
17y
119
15Fairness vs. Goodness
Eliezer Yudkowsky
17y
21
103Cooperating with agents with different ideas of fairness, while resisting exploitation
Eliezer Yudkowsky
12y
42
275Your Cheerful Price
Eliezer Yudkowsky
5y
83
210Unifying Bargaining Notions (1/2)
Ω
Diffractor
3y
Ω
41
162Threat-Resistant Bargaining Megapost: Introducing the ROSE Value
Ω
Diffractor
3y
Ω
19
124Bayesian Injustice
Kevin Dorst
2y
10
96By Which It May Be Judged
Eliezer Yudkowsky
13y
941
62Balancing Games
jefftk
2y
18
29Aggregative Principles of Social Justice
Cleo Nardo
1y
10
28Aggregative principles approximate utilitarian principles
Cleo Nardo
1y
3
28Freaky unfairness
benelliott
15y
10
Load More (15/34)
Add Posts