LESSWRONG
LW

127
Wikitags

VNM Theorem

Edited by abramdemski last updated 22nd Sep 2020

The VNM theorem is one of the classic results of Bayesian decision theory. It establishes that, under four assumptions known as the VNM axioms, a preference relation must be representable by maximum-expectation decision making over some real-valued utility function. (In other words, rational decision making is best-average-case decision making.)

Starting with some set of outcomes, gambles (or lotteries) are defined recursively. An outcome is a gamble, and for any finite set of gambles, a probability distribution over those gambles is a gamble.

Preferences are then expressed over gambles via a preference relation. if A is preferred to B, this is written A>B. We also have indifference, written A∼B. If A is either preferred to B or indifferent with B, this can be written A≥B.

The four VNM axioms are:

  1. Completeness. For any gambles A and B, either A>B, B>A, or A∼B.
  2. Transitivity. If A<B and B<C, then A<C.
  3. Continuity. If A≤B≤C, then there exists a probability p∈[0,1] such that  pA+(1−p)C∼B. In other words, there is a probability which hits any point between two gambles.
  4. Independence. For any C and p∈[0,1], we have A≤B if and only if pA+(1−p)C≤pB+(1−p)C. In other words, substituting A for B in any gamble can't make that gamble worth less.

In contrast to Utility Functions, this tag focuses specifically on posts which discuss the VNM theorem itself.

Subscribe
Discussion
2
Subscribe
Discussion
2
Posts tagged VNM Theorem
50Why you must maximize expected utility
Benya
13y
76
36VNM expected utility theory: uses, abuses, and interpretation
Academian
15y
51
26VNM agents and lotteries involving an infinite number of possible outcomes
AlexMennen
13y
8
22Money pumping: the axiomatic approach
Stuart_Armstrong
16y
93
59Consequentialists: One-Way Pattern Traps
David Udell
3y
3
5Continuity axiom of vNM
Stuart_Armstrong
11y
13
185Geometric Rationality is Not VNM Rational
Scott Garrabrant
3y
27
97Is "VNM-agent" one of several options, for what minds can grow up into?
AnnaSalamon
9mo
55
93Don't Get Distracted by the Boilerplate
johnswentworth
7y
19
50Crystal Healing — or the Origins of Expected Utility Maximizers
Alexander Gietelink Oldenziel, RP, Kaarel
2y
11
42Using vector fields to visualise preferences and make them consistent
Ω
MichaelA, JustinShovelain
6y
Ω
32
25Verifying vNM-rationality requires an ontology
jeyoor
7y
5
23Turning Some Inconsistent Preferences into Consistent Ones
niplav
3y
5
19Generalizing Foundations of Decision Theory
Ω
abramdemski
9y
Ω
11
17Consequences of arbitrage: expected cash
Stuart_Armstrong
16y
28
Load More (15/18)
Add Posts