The Modern Eldritch Deities have also always existed, alongside the traditional ones; we just never talked about them because the traditional ones were worse.
Arguably they weren't as powerful or as eldritch before. The economy has always been a complex beast, but it was probably relatively more manageable when it boiled down to "90% of all people work on making barely enough food that we do not starve, 7% make tools for the 90%, 3% are on military and administrative duty and get to syphon off all the surplus". And each local system was relatively isolated. It's an interesting question whether the growth in complexity has outstripped our growth in understanding; maybe we hit an optimum ratio of understanding/complexity around Adam Smith and then things have gotten out of hand.
This is false. Consider the examples of Modern Eldritch Deities given: "The Government, Academia, Geopolitics, Bureaucracies, The Culture, The Algorithm, Technology, Ideologies."
Academia didn't exist 10,000 years ago. Nor did bureaucracies, geopolitics, or The Algorithm. To the extent that government, culture, technology, and ideologies did exist, they were legible and understandable by humans.ย
IMO the part about Bureaucracy is likely not true 10k years ago, although it is (as you cite) 6k years ago. The Academia part is not clear to me as a parallel - becoming a priest was (I would expect) mostly a thing of actual belief, as people used to actually believe things, in ways that our Academia (the Eldritch kind) is not.
Thanks for taking the time to write this! I generally like it. I have a lot of notes, because I think there's a better version of this that I'd really like.
As it stands, I think this post relies too much on 'feel-good' or agreed-upon Lesswrong beliefs, and isn't super useful.
This would benefit from being 30-50% shorter. There are a fair amount of tangents that should be their own conversation/argument, which makes me hesitant to implicitly cosign this by sharing it. I would send it to people if it had less rambles.
It seems like the "Eldritch Deity" framing is being used in two ways in this article, implicitly:
Shorten:
This section restates the previous section!
The interesting part of this section doesn't get enough time: "Very few people are trying to reclaim power in a useful way .. " I would expand on the examples listed, and explore this idea more.
The first part of this is fine. A good recap. I don't like the high-level explanation. I don't see how cultural tradition or communal values (I assume this is what's being pointed at here with "Traditional Eldritch Deities") would help with the current deities of e.g. the economy.
Again I think this suffers from overloading of the phrase "Eldritch Deities", and if this was cleared up maybe there's a better point here.
I like Progress & Agency. I like the call to change this.
I would like more discussion of what this looks like - similar to how I think the most interesting part of panicking was people actually trying to tackle the problem brought up in this post.
"Woke, wokeism" - unless I'm very off-base these have never seemed like 'real' terms to me. They're woefully overdefined & reading them just makes me cringe.
The ability to which we understand certain things, e.g. human biology, seems overstated. Yes, we know many mechanisms we didn't use to know & it seems like many things are an engineering problem, but like the body is just so complex - in the same way that modern Eldritch Deities are, even!
1. I've noticed that many people, including myself, have come to similar ideas in the past ~5 years. Often the word 'egregore' is used to refer to (a subset?) of what you would call 'The Eldritch'.
See e.g.:
https://exploringegregores.wordpress.com/who-worships-an-evil-god-2/
https://www.thepsmiths.com/p/review-demons-by-fyodor-dostoevsky
https://morphenius.substack.com/p/food-for-thoughts
2. You say there's a class of (now conquered) Natural Eldritch Deities like "astronomy, plate tectonics, the climate, physics, chemistry and biology". I think it's a mistake to consider these things as being the same kind of thing as Ideologies, Bureaucracies, and Academia. These are subject to natural selection and can mutate and spread, unlike the Natural Eldritch Deities. Thus they can be understood well as agentic entities, whereas astronomy, etc. cannot.
I think the climate and biology are reasonably applied to the same category, and maybe plate tectonics(?), but I agree that astronomy, physics and chemistry are odd picks.
Biology is subject to natural selection and mutates and spreads. The climate doesn't exactly do this, but it is a dynamic self-maintaining equilibrium, and it responds to shocks by adjusting in surprising ways which can then spread, so it doesn't seem crazy to treat it as a Natural Eldritch Deity. (Plus, the climate was, literally, treated like an intelligent agent until it was understood/'conquered'.)
We are building new gods in the hope that they will love us.
You may laugh as though this were impossible or recoil in fear if you know it is.
But it is what we're doing.
This eclipses all other efforts to navigate those eldritch forces.
Will our new gods love us, or at least obey us? If they obey, will their mortal masters use their power for their brethren, or to create strange new worlds?
This piece is amazing. Thank you. I absolutely love the framing and agree with the analysis of the situation - only the action recommendations need to be updated
Like most incisive analyses of the current historical situation, this piece is hugely incomplete, particularly because it does not take account for likely progress in AI.
I generally agree with everything though I think here and there you bury too many choices that absolutely are born out of personal agency under the same mantle as the true unintelligible complexity. While we are absolutely powerless if we want the Eldritch gods to work in our favour, it actually is within the individual ability of the more powerful people to simply hit them with a lead pipe until they stop working - provided they're reckless or stupid enough to want to do it. All it takes to simplify the world a lot is someone who can giving an order to fire off all the nukes they have. This is of course not really an improvement, but it is without question change.
Our biggest problem is that all in all, we are quite well off, but as all humans ever, we would like to be even better off, and our current well being hangs on such a complex system that any change is far more likely to do harm than good, because we're already in a low entropy part of the phase space and there are very few ways to arrange things to be better compared to how many there are for them to be worse. And of course even the most knowledgeable of us have no clue how to do that, let alone the average voter (or politician).
Largely agreed, except on one point.
I think there are many safe ways to improve things, even with our partial understanding. This seems much more practically relevant than how many good vs bad actions there are in my opinion.
"The Algorithm" is in the hands of very few actors. This is the prime gear where "Evil People have figured it out, and hold The Power" isn't a fantasy. There would be many obvious improvements if it were in adult hands.
There are a few things that I would consider relatively straightforward, obvious improvements from my position as someone who probably is upper 0.1% in education, and many of these "obvious" things are far from it for most people if I am to judge from the actual outcomes of electoral politics, let alone guaranteed to actually work without a hitch. And still very little that I'd call a solution for the really large issues.
The eldritch horror analogy is interesting. I like it overall. If we extend the analysis to include not just the gods, but the people involved, I believe it adds another dimension to the discussion.ย
In eldritch horror there are rarely any good guys. Arguably there are none. There are typically two groups of actors, and the rest of humanity is an ignorant mass concerned with mundane matters.ย Innocent of the knowledge of the supermundane.ย
The two groups of actors are the priests, and the individuals who seek to thwart the priests using some other eldritch power. The priests are universally bad. They worship their god at the expense of everything, and everyone, else. The oppositional force, letโs call them adepts, seek to keep the priests in check. They do not worship the eldritch gods, but they do use esoteric knowledge of other eldritch gods in furtherance of their mission. There is a semblance of altruism in their opposition to the priests, but itโs more accurate to view their behavior as the cost of their education in their arts. A moral obligation that comes with their pursuit of knowledge for their own ends.
The priests and the adepts both use their beliefs as mechanisms to bypass moral and ethical considerations. They have a higher calling or self imposed obligation they use to justify their actions. The only people left untouched by the eldritch horrors are the people who donโt get involved. The central lesson in the genre is that no good comes from getting involved.ย
Since this essay is about getting involved, I think we must ask what the goal is, and where the solution lies. Are we to play the role of the priest or the adept? Are we accelerating the rise of eldritch horror, or are we shaping the horror to benefit ourselves while minimizing the impact to non-participants?ย
Once a role is chosen, the location of the solution must be determined, and here, I believe, is the crux of all this. Is the eldritch horror actually the problem, or is the problem the people involved? By targeting the god weโre really no different than the priests who use the god to justify immortality. By targeting the god weโre just continuing an age old game of making war on ideas while the priests are out conjuring new gods. By targeting the priests weโre crossing a line that, historically, hasnโt resulted in much good, and has created suffering so profound we define our temporal position by it.ย
So what is the point? Weโre either wasting our time in an eternal philosophical conflict or weโre engaging in an eternal physical conflict and the moral quagmire that entails. Does reason truly demand we get involved, or are we citing reason as an excuse to pursue personal gain?ย
Within the genre of eldritch horror, reason would seem to dictate no action. There is limited room for the role of the scribe who records the deeds of the priests and adepts. That allows for intellectual satisfaction, but the neutrality required is notoriously difficult to maintain. If the compulsion to act cannot be overcome, perhaps a gatherer and recorder of information is a viable option.ย
ย
Nice comment.
This deals with a lot of the themes from the follow-up essay, which I expect you may be interested in.
You were right. I was interested and genuinely enjoyed the article. I hope there is a Part III. I am interested to know about your personal approach. ย
this might be silly, but I had an allergic reaction to the excessive amount of emphasis. strong downvote for that. I'm sure if your memetic immune system doesn't see that as an attack, it tastes spicy in a good way, but I find it to feel oversaturated and unwelcome.
I have unvoted this comment, in expectation that if I don't communicate that I know it's a bit sharp, it will be received worse.
I agree, but only to the extent that I found the various different typefaces for the e.g. "The Economy" somewhat off-putting, and not enough to downvote. I think sticking to one 'ornate' typeface (e.g. ๐๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ช or ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐) would have been sufficient for this post to make the point. The use of bolding was a bit excessive, but not enough to feel off-putting in the same way as the varied typefaces.
EDIT: On a re-read, I may have misunderstood a key line. I translated "Most people have no hope of understanding complex topics" as "Most people can't understand complex topics", whereas you could have intended "Most people do not hope/believe that they can understand complex topics" while leaving the question of whether this is a correct viewpoint unanswered. I'm leaving what I wrote as-is, but flagging that it might have been (confirmed with author: I misunderstood) a response to a misunderstanding on my part.
This post generates in me a strong urge to write a counterpoint post. Sorry this is long.
You start by saying, basically, most people find the world complicated and confusing and don't expect to understand things. The repeated use of "most people" without providing evidence that these are attributes that plausibly do apply to most people raises a red flag for me, it pattern matches to "most people are dumb", but let's let that pass, and assume you're right that most people are confused by the world much of the time, and don't feel like coming to greater understanding is a thing they could do. That may be true, seems plausible. But then you say this:
Most people have no hope of understanding complex topics.
No. Strongly disagree. "Most people don't understand X" is a thing I could accept, and "most people feel like they can't understand X, for many Xes" seems like it could be true, but "most people can't understand X" is usually false, with only rare exceptions. Things are complex, yes, but complex on the level of "it takes some study to get the basics, but people of average intelligence could do it if they chose to" not "this is an eldritch deity unto you, you are not a high-IQ priest, abandon all hope of understanding it".
I think there may be an important difference between how you're modeling getting to the point of "I understand this topic", and how I model getting to that point. And that became clear right near the line above, where you said:
Thus, for them, experts are not people to whom we conveniently defer in order to save time. Itโs not like they think they could read the state of the art of a field (most have never heard โSOTAโ!) and build their own justified opinion.
You seem to be thinking of "I understand this topic" as equivalent to "I have reached the state of the art in this topic", and presenting an implicit dichotomy between "I think I can get to a state of the art understanding on this topic" and "I have no clue, this topic is indistinguishable from magic for me". Whereas I think there's a lot of middle ground, and reaching the state of the art is not required to have useful understanding that turns a topic from eldritch mystery to "I understand basically how this works, it doesn't seem mysterious, there are some topics around the edges of our knowledge that are still being researched, but the basics that everyone agrees on, or the major schools of thought, are ______". And once you reach that point, people will (in my experience) start treating you like some kind of expert even though you are most definitely not. But you will be in a middle ground, where you can explain to people with basically 0 knowledge on a topic what some of the experts are saying.
As an example, let's take computer science. It may feel mysterious to most people why, when they touch a spot on their screen, the phone does a thing and things change. But, this is not a mystery that is beyond the ken of your average person. Within a finite and manageable number of hours, I could explain from the ground up some basic things like what Boolean logic is, what a logic gate is, show someone some assembly language code and get them to agree that yes it's plausible the assembly language is made of the logic components we discussed earlier, show them a higher-level programming language and get them to agree that yes, a few things like a conditional or a for loop can be implemented in the assembly language, and then show them a function that connects to a touch event... and then they understand how when they press a button their phone does a thing. They're not at the forefront of human knowledge in computer science by any stretch, but it's no longer mysterious.
Or let's take the economy. It seems mysterious to many. But it's not actually mysterious in the way unanswered questions in physics are. Some parts of it, like stock market prices, are anti-inductive, but the concept of something that is anti-inductive can be explained fairly easily, and with a few university classes (undergrad, doesn't require exceptional intelligence or talent, just a few months of effort) you can understand the fundamentals of how the economy works. Yes, economists are tinkering around the edges and expanding our knowledge, but all you have to do is listen to this song, and then figure out what each line means, and you've got the basics: Fear the Boom and Bust: Keynes vs. Hayek - The Original Economics Rap Battle!
Which is like, a lot to ask of someone who's got a busy life, but definitely not cosmic-horror impossible. Because this seemed like something lots of people found mysterious, I wrote a thing to point friends to which explained it in layperson terms. Myron's Musings : The Economy. It's not the best, but it's an OK starting point where I can say to a friend "go read this thing I wrote and then we can chat and you'll get the economy better than you do now".
Or housing, which is a subcase of governance more generally and the insights generalize: Trying to make it so that the broad forces that have changed things so it's harder to build now than it used to be are different, is a bit beyond the average person's circle of control. But "and so I give up and rot" is the wrong response. If you want your town or city to build more housing, that is a thing you can make happen. Because your city council is just a few people, the city plan and zoning regulations are things you can read and understand, documents created by humans who had ideas of what a good document on this topic would look like, and you can talk to the current custodian of that document about what a better version would be. Or you can like, look on the city's website, see when the meetings about building things are happening, and go to them, because they're typically open to the public. You will quickly find the people at those meetings are just regular people, not priests with special knowledge. But at the same time, approximately nobody does this, and so if you do it you'll be at the rarefied heights of expertise relative to most people, even though you haven't done anything that's actually intellectually challenging.
We can change this.
This requires a lot of work. The work needed is comparable in scope to the Scientific Revolution, the era of the Enlightenment, or the rise of Formalism.
We will need to transcend our superstitious understanding of the Modern Eldritch Deities. We will need to build a mechanistic understanding of politics, governance, morals and collective action.
Letโs get there step by step. And the first step to defeating the enemy is to name it.
If we donโt do this, weโre condemned to getting screw over by it, never understanding what is happening to us.
I don't actually think the change that's required here is comparable in scope to the scientific revolution. it's a change in attitude, from "the world is confusing, and I can't understand it or do anything about it", to "the world is currently confusing to me in some ways, but is made of understandable parts, and I can understand them if I try, and then push on metaphorical levers that will make changes". And luckily, it has never been easier to learn about complex topics. Back when I took my econ courses, you pretty much had to go sit in a classroom and pay thousands to tens of thousands of dollars to get that knowledge, but now many places put online courseware out there for free or very cheap.
Why I was motivated to write this big long thing (again, apologies), is because of the "most people have no hope of understanding complex topics" line. That understanding of the possibilities open to most people is threaded through the rest of the post, and if it's correct, then I would think the we can change this line is probably false. Either people have a hope of understanding the world around them, and we should communicate that fact to them, or they don't, and I guess they're doomed.
Most people have no hope of understanding complex topics.
No. Strongly disagree. "Most people don't understand X" is a thing I could accept, but "most people can't understand X" is usually false, with only rare exceptions.
ย
You are confusing "Most people can't understand X." with "Most people have no hope of understanding X.". Only the latter matter for the psychological toll it has on people.
Hopelessness might be warranted or not, but it's there.
---
Separately, I believe that quite often, their hopelessness is warranted.
Everyone hits their ceilings.
I know many mathematically talented people who struggle to express themselves in ways that are legible to others, or to move their body in a natural way. They will get better if they train, but it's pretty clear to them and everyone else that their ceiling is low.
In general, I know many people talented [at a field] with clear limitations in [some other field]. Arts, maths, oral expression, style, empathy, physical strength, body awareness, and so on.
Over time, they learn to acknowledge their talents and their limitations.
Oops - I realized you may have intended a different meaning than I assumed, on a re-read.
Separately, my experience has been that many people think they can't understand things when they can. The sense of hopelessness and powerlessness in a world that's too complicated for them is out of proportion to how complicated the world actually is. I'm thinking of a specific example of a good friend of mine who is clearly smart enough she could do lots of things, and made a point of telling me in the recent past that my willingness to go out and try and do things was inspiring to her, and she asked if I thought she might be able to do similarly, and I was like "obviously yes, there is no actual barrier stopping you, anything I've done that you're pointing at, you also could have done, possibly better than I did".
I don't think the powerlessness many people feel in the face of complexity is a result of them hitting an intellectual capacity ceiling after trying to understand a complex topic, recognizing they've hit their ceiling, and stopping. I think it's often a case of thinking "this is too complicated for me" and not even trying. My best guess (just a guess) is that many people do feel like only people who are smarter than them can do certain things (like making laws, understanding computers, understanding what makes the economy go), when this isn't actually true. Our society does seem to inculcate in its members the idea that certain things are only for super-smart people to do, and whoever you are, you are not smart enough to do an impactful thing. I also suspect this may be load-bearing, in that if everyone who could tried to push things in the direction they thought they should go instead of saying "that's beyond my ability", we'd have a more chaotic world.
I think regardless of the details the statement in its strongest form is true of virtually everyone. Maybe anyone, if they just applied themselves, could work hard their whole life and achieve mastery of one topic. Let's concede that.
That still leaves all of the other topics that are equally relevant to their lives and have no hope to have enough time to also understand before they die. I understand a lot about science and computers, and I'm even decently polymath-y enough to get a bit of stuff like biology, medicine, law. But I'm still dependent on the "priesthoods" of those fields; a mediocre lawyer knows far more law than I do. And it's simply not economical nor, ultimately, possible for me to achieve a comparable level of understanding at everything I'd need to to be able to look at the world and say "ah, yes, I get it now, I see how the cogs tick".
I believe...
Our society does seem to inculcate in its members the idea that certain things are only for super-smart people to do, and whoever you are, you are not smart enough to do an impactful thing.
Most people would fail at passing the bar and the USMLE. This is why most people do not attempt them, and this is why our society tells them not to.
I believe it is load bearing, but in the straightforward way: it would be catastrophic if everyone tried to study things far beyond their abilities and wasted their time.
If the economy is so easily understood then why do we have high inflation, a cost of living crisis, rising inequality?ย
The thing that is not understood is why these things are happening and how we can change things so that normal people are better off.ย
The fact that some people have some coherent theories for some aspects of the economy is not equivalent to us understanding the economy.ย
Clarification: my position is that our current level of understanding of how the economy works can, for the most part, be grasped by most people with some effort, rather than being an impenetrable mystery. Not that everyone actually does understand the economy because it's super easy, and certainly not that if they did we wouldn't have economic problems. None of what I said is incompatible with what you said.
It would be nice if understanding how things worked automatically led to things working better, but this is not the case.
A simple example where understanding an underlying problem doesn't solve the problem: I understand fairly well why I'm tempted to eat too many potato chips, and why this is bad for me, and what I could do instead. And yet, sometimes I still eat more potato chips than I intend.
A more complicated case: a few people making a lot of money, while most people's lives get better due to specialization and trade (counting the world economy as a whole, not necessarily within a particular village, or country) is what one would predict given an understanding of how the economy works. There are of course many complications in the real world that aren't captured in economic models, which often make simplifying assumptions like "people are rational". In the real world, people do things like eat potato chips a nonzero number of times.
A simple example where understanding an underlying problem doesn't solve the problem: I understand fairly well why I'm tempted to eat too many potato chips, and why this is bad for me, and what I could do instead. And yet, sometimes I still eat more potato chips than I intend.
This is a great example.
Some people, specifically thanks to their better understanding of themselves, do not find themselves eating more potato chips than they intend.
There is more.
I especially liked the London/Brexit examples (unfortunately, Iโve had to deal with the โpolice have no funds for theftโ conversation too).
On the โexperts as priestsโ analogy: I think it misses something important. Historically, priests (or the Clergy) had wide-ranging authority (religious, political, financial, legal) which is precisely why liberal societies built separation of powers. I guess I don't perceive "Experts" as generalists in that sense. Theyโre people whoโve specialized in a narrow slice of the system, and ideally should only be deferred to within that slice.
What I've thought of before is this: maybe the deeper failure mode isnโt that we have โpriests,โ but that we silo experts so completely. Each chunk of knowledge is developed in isolation, with little incentive to situate it in the larger system. This produces blind spots and coordination failures, not because expertise is bad, but because it's rarely built with systems-thinking or structured cooperation.ย
I loved the encouragement to remember our sense of agency rather than just feeling stuck!
Right now, we are stuck.
We have lost the belief in Progress. That each year will be better than the previous one, for humanity.
We have lost the belief in Agency. That we can do something about it.
ย
Who is this "we"? This general framing presents the problem as a universal problem of modernity but a lot of the material feeding your 'vibes' are quite specific results of policy failures (e.g., in the UK, US) measured against your own preferences.ย
There are many people in Iceland, Switzerland, Norway, Singapore &c, who do not feel this oppressive ennui. Instead, things work quite well, the government is sane and in control, and public discourse is by-and-large rational.ย
It is tempting to see an eldritch horror as the problem, one which can be killed with arcane magic, because it avoids the difficult truth that the problem is a suite of local political obstacles which need to be successively overcome.ย
There are many people in Iceland, Switzerland, Norway, Singapore &c, who do not feel this oppressive ennui. Instead, things work quite well, the government is sane and in control, and public discourse is by-and-large rational.
Do they believe that they have a say in civilization's direction? It's all well and good to have cozy little enclaves under the wing of the US hegemony while it lasts, but if it falters, something relevant beyond local political obstacles may just emerge. Of course, all in all, their position is still more enviable than most.
But the truth is that no one has power.
I agree with what you're pointing at, but not with this statement. I think it's worse than this. There are (groups of) people who (collectively) know how to make (some) things better. But The Power is held collectively by those you label The Powerless, and they lack the skills or drive to even know how to choose the right priesthood-holders to trust. As a result we spend an awful lot of time and effort tying our hands and shooting our feet, while competing would-be priests shout ineffectually at one another, regardless of who has a record of having made correct predictions before. Our ancestors may not have understood the natural world, but if someone showed up and made the right guesses about the behavior of some eldritch god vastly more often than anyone else could do, they would have been either elevated to leadership or feared/hated/condemned for black magic. We lost that skill, I think, in favor of playing social status games, the moment it sunk in that the natural-world-threats felt distant.
Aka: In practice we are sex-obsessed murder-monkeys and all of this is way above our pay grade.ย
I think lots of people have power to do stuff but the limits are such that it's a lot easier to break things than it is to build them.
Suppose you were magically elected POTUS with the mandate of Making Things Much Better. How do you fix the economy, or the climate, or anything else in four years, with "only" at your disposal the full might of the United States, within your ability to command it? You would be faced with a ton of options, uncertainties, compromises, a few good ideas but none fully resolutive.
Now suppose the same thing happened, but with the mandate of Making Things Much Worse. That sounds like an easy enough job!
Sure, I mostly meant the limits as in all sorts of constraints (what people will and won't allow you to get away with, what is knowable, what is easily computed/predicted, etc). But ultimately it really boils down to, every step in the "better" direction requires moving towards an even smaller state space and thus decreasing bits of entropy in the state of the world. So in a sense it literally is a fight against the second law of thermodynamics.
I believe our ancestors elevated and condemned people for reasons mostly separate from whether they statistically made better predictions. Things like "Does this sound good?", "Does this help give more power to the leader?", "Is the person uttering the various statements seemingly convinced of them?", "Can the person make it seem like the statements matched the reality post-hoc?", etc.
It might have correlated in some cases, but what I am pointing at something much more hit-or-miss than the process you are describing.
I initially upvoted this post for the interesting way it was written. After reflecting more on the actual contents, though, I feel that style is being used to mask a number of claims I strongly disagree with, and that the momentum of cosmic eldritch vibes is cruising over them in a way that doesn't leave them any breathing space or opportunity to justify themselves. This could be fine, but the claims themselves are incredibly cynical, and I don't want them to be taken for granted. It is too easy, for those in despair, to let little irrationalities slip by because "everyone feels it", and treating that anguish with a grandiose literary style reinforcing all their darkest thoughts on top of 150+ upvotes doesn't help. So, I've switched to a strong downvote.
Here are some specific examples:
Through a Rightful Struggle, growing and triumphing against our Dark Impulses, we should Defeat Evil and Enact Good.
This is so tragically wrong, naive and pathetic.
No, it isn't. There is a lot of evil in the world, and enacting good at scale is hard, but this is not evidence that good and evil are ontologically broken. Malaria is still bad, and preventing the spread of malaria is still good. The rise of thievery in London is not evidence that The Rightful Struggle is a meaningless story believed only by the naive and clueless, any more than losing a battle would be evidence against the existence of a war.
I am lucky enough to live in a city where there are not many pickpockets, and I like this, and I don't expect that to go away just because the "adults in the room" are a "pathetic fantasy of the child". As it happens, "there are adults in the room who are capable of keeping petty crime to a minimum" is sometimes just true. It is not wise to believe that you have transcended right and wrong, just because you don't know what to do; and it is more pathetic, I would argue, to scoff at people who are trying to turn the vast confusing world into stories they can understand, without succumbing to despair, for being "naive".
There are more forms of escapism beyond fantasising about a Big Bad Guy. [...] Isolating oneself in the mountains, in a cottage or in video games.
These are not (just) forms of escapism, these are things people like to do. People live in cottages because nature is pretty, or because the quiet is good for studying or meditating, or because they just prefer to be alone. People play video games to escape their lives, sometimes, but others - including kids, who I am confident are not stressed out about The Economy - like the challenges of reflexes and problem-solving, or get lost in the strange geographies and complex systems, or the plots, or because their friends are playing them, or the basic pleasure of messing around on a computer.
This section really irks me, because it's taking something benign and pleasant and recasting it as a dangerous distraction from the all-consuming task of worrying about Economy And Culture. But videogames are culture! What is all this worrying for, if not for the ongoing interests of humans to take walks in the woods, to while away an hour on quiet daydreaming, to play games with each other and tell each other stories? What are you so afraid of being lost, if people take the time to enjoy themselves? Why does it all have to be "disconnected from everything that matters"? What could possibly matter more?
Most people do NOT have the expectation that if they study a technical topic, they will eventually understand how it works at a mechanistic level.
This is sort of true, but it's not universal, and it's certainly no excuse for you (the general 'you') to hold this expectation. The attitude I admire on Lesswrong is one that tells people, insistently, that you can "just do things", one which tries to compile the best textbooks on every subject because all the information is out there and nothing is stopping you from reading them. If 'normal people' assume that the world is made of magic and they can never understand it, so much the worse for normal people (this attitude would say). You can just learn how computers work! You can just develop the skills you'd like to have! It takes a while, but The Culture can't stop you.
We have built and migrated to an artificial world.
[...]
There is no myth that makes sense of it.
There is no one to fault.
No one wants this.
Everyone is lost, unable to find a home.
This is maybe a less photogenic disagreement than the above, so I'm probably making my overall comment weaker by including it. But, personally, I love living in the glitchy confusion of vast cosmic artifice, formed in the image of human desire, misshapen and distorted by their size, sprouting their own deranged interiorities. We are so small, and The Algorithms are so vast, and they care about nothing more than our petty little needs and fantasies. Tossing and turning in an endless machine of decontextualized desires, boiling alive in the ongoing manifestation of the collective unconscious. It's fucking cool. The cosmic horror of it all only makes it more alluring.
Don't tell me that "no one wants this". I want this. I like our modern eldritch deities - a hell of a lot better than the old ones, anyway. Not everything sacred has been destroyed.
Even if the Evil People do not make all the bad things go away, it would still be reassuring.
Do you mean something like, 'Even if defeating the evil people does not make all the bad things go away'?
Nope.
I meant that even if the Evil People are Evil, and thus decide to not make all the bad things go away, the fact that they could make them go away is reassuring in itself.
I should have been clearer.
(I have edited it with the hope of making it clearer. Thanks.)
Very little makes sense. As we start to understand things and adapt to the rules, they change again.
We live much closer together than we ever did historically. Yet we know our neighbours much less.
We have witnessed the birth of a truly global culture. A culture that fits no one. A culture that was built by Social Mediaโs algorithms, much more than by people. Let alone individuals, like you or me.
We have more knowledge, more science, more technology, and somehow, our governments are more stuck. No one is seriously considering a new Bill of Rights for the 21st century, or a new Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen.
โ
Cosmic Horror as a genre largely depicts how this all feels from the inside. As ordinary people, we are powerless in the face of forces beyond our understanding. Cosmic Horror also commonly features the idea that bad things can happen to us without us noticing, and the angst that comes from it.
The genre often features Eldritch creatures. These are creatures that live beyond humansโ understanding. But whilst humans canโt understand or influence them, they can affect humans. Sometimes, they may even forcefully alter peopleโs thoughts and actions.
โ
As humans, we have always been confronted with the Eldritch. The world was never our home, it was never designed to be legible or pleasant to us.
We come to life screaming and crying, without the intellectual means to understand why we got ejected from a nice place into a deeply inhospitable, cold and uncaring universe.
Many stories echo this. From Hesiodโs Golden Age to the Garden of Eden, we started in a state of primordial ease, where humans lived in a world that was good for them. But something happened, and we landed on Earth, with all of its suffering and hardships.
Even our lives start that way. We all have been children.
As children, we had very little agency. Our fates were in the hands of adults, entities much more powerful than we are. Although adults were uncannily similar to us, they were notably different. They didnโt think the same way we did, we had to play by their rules (or else), and they decided everything around us.
This is how humanityโs history started.
We lived in hostile lands, always at the mercy of death and the elements, without the science and the tools that would let us understand what was happening.
โ
Nowadays, our Eldritch is of a different kind.
We thoroughly understand the natural world, but we have deserted it because it sucked.
We have built and migrated to an artificial world.
And yet, it is still full of phenomena we canโt understand, of inhumane entities that decide our fates.
This is existentially dreadful and awful.
There is no myth that makes sense of it.
There is no one to fault.
No one wants this.
Everyone is lost, unable to find a home.
Most people are utterly confused all the time. They get through by not expecting to understand much.
โSufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.โ
Well, aside from a very small STEM elite, technology already is indistinguishable from magic for most people.
Most people do NOT have the expectation that if they study a technical topic, they will eventually understand how it works at a mechanistic level.
They do not expect that they could learn about the state of the art of any field, and eventually make their own opinion.
They just nod, shrug and move along.
They deeply expect that even with more time, they will not understand how phones work, or how cars are built. It is too technical. Possibly, it has something to do with electricity, robots, and circuit boards?
Who knows how a computer, a factory, 5G, or vaccines work? Who expects they could know?
Very few people.
โ
Beyond deep hard tech, this also applies to soft technologies. Soft technologies include the Law, governance, how our institutions work, complex processes like containerisation, etc.
For instance, most people treat markets like magic.
Communists ascribe evil properties to markets.
Libertarians treat them as magical tools that can solve all coordination problems.
Nerds largely use them as a divination device: they speak of metaphorical markets, and explain everything through incentives and the efficient market hypothesis.
Aside from a select few people deeply interested in economics and governance, it is hard to see grounded discussions of when markets are practical solutions to practical problems, and how to deploy them safely and productively.
For most people, markets are just magic. Whether they are perceived as good magic or dark magic doesnโt matter, they are still magic.
โ
Most people have no hope of understanding complex topics.
Thus, for them, experts are not people to whom we conveniently defer in order to save time. Itโs not like they think they could read the state of the art of a field (most have never heard โSOTAโ!) and build their own justified opinion.
Instead, to most people, experts are priests, necessarily intermediaries to interpret the scientific scriptures.
Priesthood comes with a lot of authority, and thus necessitates a lot of trust.
Historically, cultures put a lot of importance on acknowledging the special status of priests. The knowledge of a priest is not fungible, not everyone can obtain it. And great power implies great responsibilities.
Priests were de facto privileged. To balance that, their lifestyles usually came with many restrictions, all anchored on discipline and rejecting excesses. Depending on the culture, it might have been forced poverty, forced celibacy, the obligation to follow many additional rituals, etc.
โ
On grounds of ideological equality, we have rejected that some people can intellectually understand things that others cannot. Variations in intelligence is a very taboo topic, rarely discussed in grounded ways.
Thus, modern priests are never confronted with their additional moral duties. They are never forced to abide by higher standards. And people resent them.
So much so that following the perceived abuses of the priest class, there has been a recent attempt at a Modern Reformation, mediated by the Internet rather than the Printing Press. Thanks to the Internet, people may not need priests anymore, being free to do their own homework.
The hope was that, through a combination of pop-science, infotainment and gamification, everyone would have become a super polymathic genius! Everyone an expert in hard sciences, soft sciences, the Law, and more!
Instead, weโve gotten internet wokeism, antivaxx, and more conspiracy theories than we ever needed.
In short, our modern global culture explicitly rejects priesthood, even though there are many fields of knowledge that people de facto do not have access to.
โ
Speaking of, no one understands ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.
I outlined one way our culture is changing: the annihilation of โexpertsโ as a class of priests.
It feels real to me, but I might be wrong.
And if Iโm right, Iโm only right after the fact, I did not predict it.
In other words, I largely do not understand Cฬฒuฬฒlฬฒtฬฒuฬฒrฬฒeฬฒ.
I am constantly getting screwed over by my limited understanding of culture. I regularly get surprised by some novel cultural phenomenon that I did not expect, and have to change my course of action accordingly.
This is true of all of us. We are all puzzled and surprised.
Cอuอlอtอuอrอeอ changes much faster than it did 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, 100 years, 200 years or 500 years ago.
Sometimes itโs for the better, sometimes itโs for the worse. But the common thread is that we donโt expect it, nor do we understand it.
Despite its critical importance to our lives, โCโuโlโtโuโrโeโ is as arbitrary as magic, part of the Eldritch.
Whilst epistemic horror, the horror of not understanding what happens around us, is a literary genre, I donโt care much for it.
I am naturally a curious person, yet I have made my peace with not knowing things.
Pragmatically though, not knowing things makes us powerless. And this is where true horror comes from.
โ
We are all disconnected from everything that matters.
No one expects that they can improve social media, governments, institutions, culture, housing prices, criminality rates around them, etc.
For example, in London, one of the richest cities in the world, thereโs a massive wave of thievery that everyone has failed to stop.
Many petty criminals roam the streets looking for phones to snatch. In the last year, 2 fuckers tried to snatch my phone. Shoplifting has exploded.
Lawrence Newport from LFG left a bike in front of Scotland Yard, and it got quickly stolen. Despite having a GPS signal, the police didnโt even check the CCTV nor tried to pursue the criminal. A response sergeant took the time to respond and explain that the police is underfunded, and doesnโt have bike thefts as a priority compared to Domestic Violence and Abuse.
One of the richest cities in the world, in front of its own policeโs headquarters, cannot prevent thievery.
Of course, vigilantism and taking matters into our own hands would be punished. And I can see why to some extent.
However, on the other hand, the police is not solving the issue, nor is the mayor, nor is the government, nor are the citizens. And no one is happy about this.
No one understands this state of affairs thoroughly enough to actually change it. Everyone is stuck.
โ
It is possible to get unstuck. But the work needed to get there is not easy.
It requires studying a complex bureaucracy, from the funding of the police and diagnosing why courts having a massive backlog of cases, to designing laws mandating stronger sentences where it should.
It then requires making this common knowledge, creating media attention, and putting enough political pressure to finally pass the laws that make sense.
In practice, no one knows how to do this reliably, and people who have tried to change have failed.
Everyone now knows that in practice, thievery is to be expected in London.
Cโest la vie. It is what it is. Shikata ga nai.
Thievery is now one of the forces of nature that a puny human has to contend with in London.
In Japan, there are earthquakes. In London, there is thievery.
ยฏ\_(ใ)_/ยฏ
โ
Londonโs thievery is just one minor example of how people feel powerless about a non-natural phenomenon. In the Eldritch Pantheon, it would be a minor spirit.
But there are Eldritch Deities that rule much bigger aspects of our lives.
For instance, ๏ผด๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผฅ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ.
What is ๐๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ช? ๐ ๐ท๐ด ๐ด๐ฒ๐พ๐ฝ๐พ๐ผ๐ is an Eldritch entity.
Sometimes, Tิาฝ Eฦฯษณฯษฑแง is good. Getting a good job and a home are easy, raising a child is cheap, we can buy a lot of stuff, and everyone is happy.
Sometimes, Tฬตออฬคhฬถฬฬฒฬeฬถฬฬป ฬดฬอฬงEฬถฬ ฬออcฬทออ ฬฅฬขoฬทฬฬฑฬขnฬถอฬฌฬนoฬดอ ฬ mฬดอฬฬฅฬyฬธอฬขฬฅ is bad. Everything is hard, and we struggle. We struggle to find a job, to borrow money for a home, to educate our children at a cheap and competent school. Everything is expensive, and everyone is unhappy.
If we pray hard enough, the next politician we vote for might แแผแฉแGE TแผE EแOแOแฐY.
lol.
ใๅไน ไนๅใๅ ใ็ชใ is not a real thing.
An eCOnoMIsT might say that it is just the combination of ๐๐๐, ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ช๐ญ๐ฉ๐ฌ๐ถ๐ช๐ข๐ซ๐ฑ โ๐๐ฑ๐ข๐ฐ, โ๐ซ๐ฑ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฐ๐ฑ โ๐๐ฑ๐ข๐ฐ ๐๐ซ๐ก ๐ช๐๐ซ๐ถ ๐๐ฑ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฏ โ๐ซ๐ก๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ฌ๐ฏ๐ฐ.
But this is obviously fake.
Everyone would talk about it even without these indicators.
Everyone knows it would still direct our lives.
โ
Many other Eldritch Deities direct our lives.
They often look the same.
For instance, I asked ChatGPT to define โีัั ัฯเนเธ เนเนืฅโ, and it gave me a very Eldritch answer:
โโโโ โโโโโโโโ is a broad term that refers to the system by which a society organizes [โฆ]. Itโs essentially the network of activities and relationships that determine [โฆ].
This is what the Eldritch Deities look like in 2025. We canโt pinpoint them. We use broad terms. Theyโre systems related to society. Theyโre network of activities and relationships.
I know them. You know them. Every modern human knows them.
Every modern human knows they are powerless in front of them.
Every modern human knows they must kowtow to them, if they donโt want to get screwed.
๐๐๐ ๐พ๐ ๐ง๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ, ๐ธ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐พ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ค, ๐น๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ค, ๐๐๐ โ๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐, ๐๐๐ ๐ธ๐๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ช, ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ค.
Theyโre all systems of networks and activities and relationships of a society.
We may have developed them. They may have arisen organically from our interactions.
But they are here, and we canโt control them. We are ants walking alongside them. They make and unmake our lives. They live by their own rules, amoral and inhumane.
Our artificial Eldritch Deities are here to stay, we are powerless in front of them, and we all feel it.
Even though everyone feels it, too many reject the surreality of the situation.
They have not mourned. Instead of believing what is true, they cling to the hope that the world makes sense.
For them, the World should be a Big Story.
The Good Guys succeed, and the Bad Guys should be defeated.
Through a Rightful Struggle, growing and triumphing against our Dark Impulses, we should Defeat Evil and Enact Good.
This is so tragically wrong, naive and pathetic.
โ
The typical fantasy of the powerless is that some Evil People have figured it out, and hold The Power.
That we just need to beat them, dispossess them, kill them even, and things will be alright.
This is the pathetic fantasy of the child who hopes there are adults in the room who can make things better when things go to shit.
"The System", "Them", (((They))), The Jews, The Capitalists, The Deep State, The Lizardmen, The Free Masons, The Patriarchy, Israel, The Illuminazis, Politicians.
This is all the same desperate cry.
โPlease, have it so that someone has power and could make all of the bad things go away.โ
Even if the Evil People do not make all the bad things go away, it would still be reassuring.
At least, someone would know whatโs going on.
At least, even if we eventually fail, there would be an Enemy who can make it all meaningful, by Struggling to take them down.
At least, there would be a meaningful story happening, with humans at its centre.
โ
But the truth is that no one has power.
Not even politicians and billionaires.
Elon Musk bought Twitter, got Trump elected, and set up DOGE. All that to fail, have Trump pass a bill directly opposed to his principles, and get ousted in less than 6 months.
No one knows how to make things go well. No one knows how, as puny little humans, we could wrestle with Eldritch entities.
This is an unsolved problem, and anyone pretending otherwise is lying.
We suck at building powerful companies that do not end up either corrupting governments, or being throttled by governments.
We suck at having conversations critical to our future without resorting to insults. Picture any conversation about immigration.
We suck at doing redistribution without disincentivising work and without incentivising fraud.
We suck at steering our culture toward any direction of our choosing.
We suck at electing politicians who can reliably pass the laws that Actual Experts my Priests say are good for the majority.
โ
This is the core of the 21st century.
Realising that we humans are living alongside entities far more powerful than we are, and that we are losing ground to them.
Gradual Disempowerment has already started, it hasnโt waited for AI.
โ
There are more forms of escapism beyond fantasising about a Big Bad Guy.
Giving up and Laying Down and Rotting.
Isolating oneself in the mountains, in a cottage or in video games.
Becoming a selfish asshole.
At best, escapism makes people useless and isolated.
At worst, it makes people panic and hurt each other.
When one realises that Eldritch entities are living alongside us, one may panic.
Thatโs the horror part of cosmic horror. Itโs shocking and terrifying.
Unfortunately, panic, horror, shock and terror are not very conducive to wisdom, healthy behaviour, trust and coordination.
โ
In their panic, some are looking a bit too hard for a Big Bad Guy. They enter an aggressive frenzy, looking to tear down any enemy near them.
The Woke Left has The Whites, The Males, The Straight, The Coloniser and The Far Right.
The Far Right has Academia, The Swamp, Immigrants and the Woke Left.
The Communist Left has Capitalists, Corporations, The State, and the Fascists.
The Conservative Right has Atheists, Sex Work, Pro-Choice, and the LGBT+.
Because of the biggest propaganda campaign of my time, everyone is also making an opinion on whether Israel or Palestine is a Big Bad Guy.
In general, when people panic, they become more extreme, and fall prey to ideological spirals. This is a major way by which Iฬทฬอdฬธฬอeฬทอฬขoฬธฬฬซlฬธฬฬoฬดฬฬ gฬถฬฬฅiฬดฬฬซeฬทออsฬดอฬฆ grow more powerful.
โ
In their panic, a select few try to grab as much power as possible.
On one hand, it might let them take a heroic stance against the Eldritch monsters.
On the other handโฆ Power is awfully convenient, isnโt it?
This usually doesnโt end well for the people.
Dominic Cummings tried to do it in the UK. He did the Vote Leave campaign and helped Boris Johnson elected. He said that although he thought Boris as a PM was โterrible for the countryโ, but that โThe least bad option seemed to be, exploit the current situation to try and push certain things through and get the country into a better position.โ
Thus, he became Borisโ senior advisor, got ousted a little more than a year later, and spent months (or years?) talking trash about Boris publicly, calling him The Trolley, and saying the faster he would go, the better things would be.
Overall, one of the main promises of Brexit (that it would help stop immigration) was broken. Immigration rose to record-high post-Brexit.
A similar thing happened with Trump and Elon.
Elon bought Twitter, used it to boost Trump. He became a โspecial government employeeโ when Trump became president, and started DOGE. Elon got ousted 4 months in (much faster than Dominic!). Then he stated that Trump was in the Epstein files and responded โYesโ to someone stating that Trump should be impeached.
Overall, one of Elonโs main promises was to reduce spending deficit through DOGE. In the end, he got ousted around the time of the Big Beautiful Bill, which drastically increased the spending deficit.
โ
This panic leads people to playing stupid games, and winning stupid prizes (like Elon or Dominic).
There are very few people who actually try to reclaim power for Team Humanity, in a way that is cooperative rather than by trying to screw over others.
Lawrence Newportโs Looking For Growth is a notable exception. In its short history, it has created a Growth Bill, spread a lot of awareness around it, engaged directly with lawmakers, built a dashboard to clarify what is going on in the UK, etc.
Vitalikโs d/acc is another one. Instead of democratic engagement, it is pursuing the way of technological research, focused on helping people coordinate and enact their will.
In many ways, the world is both more and less cosmically horrific than it was 250 years ago.
โ
We now understand almost all natural phenomena. Through our global measurement network, we can predict natural disasters before any human witnesses them. Disasters that our ancestors would have pinned on literal divinities.
We now understand biology. When people die, we largely understand what happened, we do not think it was dark magic. We have an understanding of human bodies mechanistic enough that we can design cures, and that doctors can recommend meaningful treatments instead of quack medicine.
We now understand, at least to some extent, psychology and psychiatry. We do not believe in demonic possessions anymore. We understand that mood swings exist, and have documented a large variety of hormonal as well as neurological disorders.
So much of the past belief systems was about the Natural Eldritch Monsters. But through the Great Scientific Method, we learnt to not fear them, uncovered their rules, and discovered that behind their crazy appearance, they were largely explainable in terms of physical and chemical principles.
โ
And yet.
250 years ago, we built new constitutions in the US and the EU, and created our modern civilisation.
Now, despite all of our complex technology and science (or rather, because of their complexity), we are struggling to not make housing more expensive.
We are now at the point where we are struggling to have children.
People had children when the entire world was constantly at war, when 50% of children died before 10, when everyone was dirt poor, when no one had Amazon or instant comms.
Now, almost everywhere, we are failing to have enough children to merely hit replacement-level fertility rates.
โ
Thereโs something big that has happened. We went to the moon, but now we struggle to have children? Whatโs up with that.
My high level explanation for this paradox isโฆ
1) We managed to unravel, scientifically study, and to some extent dominate the Natural Eldritch Deities.
We understand astronomy, plate tectonics, the climate, physics, chemistry and biology.
Although there are still things to be learnt, they are not mysterious, magical or Eldritch anymore. They are regular puzzles, like jigsaws, and we are confident weโll get there eventually.
2) To get there, we conjured the Modern Eldritch Deities, which come with their own problems.
It seems obvious that we cannot meaningfully steer ๐๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ช๐ข, ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ญ๐ฐ๐ฃ๐ข๐ญ ๐๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐บ, ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ญ๐ฐ๐ฃ๐ข๐ญ ๐๐ถ๐ญ๐ต๐ถ๐ณ๐ฆ, ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ญ๐จ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ๐ฎ, etc. That many problems are arising from this failure.
But it seems equally obvious that getting rid of all of them would be disastrous.
So we are stuck in awkward codependent relationships with these entities.
3) Our Modern Eldritch Deities killed the Traditional Eldritch Deities.
We, modern humans, are not the first to conjure Eldritch Deities.
Our ancestors had already conjured many Eldritch Deities to deal with their own problems. Religions, pantheons, superstitions, ritual systems, and more.
We killed all of them.
In theory, we could have made rational decisions about which ones to keep and which ones to kill. Possibly reshaping some of them, to fit our needs best.
This might have meant: observing Chestertonโs Fence, following a conservative precautionary principle when deciding to stop rituals followed by millions, experimenting with different norms in different places, keeping the rituals and vibes but removing the fictitious beliefs, any of this.
But we did not.
God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?
We killed the sacred. Not only did we kill it, we have eradicated it so thoroughly that we donโt really have the words left to talk about the problems it was solving.
ย
Right now, we are stuck.
We have lost the belief in Progress. That each year will be better than the previous one, for humanity.
We have lost the belief in Agency. That we can do something about it.
We see that we are dependent on entities that do not always want whatโs best for us. ๐ฒ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐พ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ธ๐๐๐๐.
โ
We can change this.
This requires a lot of work. The work needed is comparable in scope to the Scientific Revolution, the era of the Enlightenment, or the rise of Formalism.
We will need to transcend our superstitious understanding of the Modern Eldritch Deities. We will need to build a mechanistic understanding of politics, governance, morals and collective action.
Letโs get there step by step. And the first step to defeating the enemy is to name it.
If we donโt do this, weโre condemned to getting screw over by it, never understanding what is happening to us.
โ
I have seen too many people feel the bad vibe, never putting words on it, and just getting passively demotivated. Or falling into ideological spirals.
I expect this article will be paradoxically motivating to a few. When I talk to people, it usually frees them a little to name the problem, understand that it is real, that it is not about them, and that this problem is one we can study and eventually solve.
On this, cheers!