I've noticed that people who have a hard time in intro-to-physics classes usually fail in a fairly predictable way: they see a problem, don't know how to solve it, and stop. But there's a trick to solving physics problems when you're not sure how. The general method is:
Make a diagram or something, to depict what you know about the problem and make it easier to figure out stuff you don't know.
Look at the problem until you can derive something you don't already know. Even if you have no idea how it will help (or if it will help) do the calculations, and write them down.
Repeat step 2 until you see how to get to the answer.
The problem is when someone, not seeing a way all the way to the solution, stops trying instead of looking to make incremental progress.
I'm sure this applied to more than introductory physics problems. It's very similar to Terry Tao's advice on how to do math:
...I don't have any magical ability. I look at a problem, and it looks something like one I've done before; I think maybe the idea that worked before will work here. Nothing's working out; then you think of a small trick that makes it a little better but still is not quite right. I play with the problem,
The first place I saw the claim that a huge amount of life success is encapsulated in many simple life optimization "tricks" (or "cheat codes" in your terminology) was in David Allen's book "Getting Things Done" which is full of many such tricks (plus motivational exhortations) organized around the rough theme of efficiently increasing the number of one-off embarrassingly parallel actions you accomplish per day.
I prefer the term "technique" personally because when I tried using Mr. Allen's term "trick" it sometimes backfired and confused people into thinking that there was bad moral intent involved. They could teach me one, and I would be happy and exclaim "That's an awesome trick!" and they would get defensive instead of take it as the compliment I intended it to be. I suspect that your term "cheatcodes" will run into this problem even more dramatically because it literally contains the word cheat in it.
The term "technique" primes for things like skill development, kung fu, painting, and technology rather than "violation of social norms" so it is safer to use, but all of these terms are im...
I forget, what's our term for 'counter-arguments which are bogus and not actually why a person disbelieves what they disbelieve'? I'm sure we have one.
Anyway, this is a classic example. First, her argument is internally weak. What, the physical conditioning will be of little benefit? The hand strikes will simply not be useful? The reflexes cease to operate when she is in her mufti? The skirt reduces any footwork (not even talking about kicks here) to utter uselessness? And so on. Risible.
Second, not to insult your friend, but either she knows very little about martial arts or she hasn't asked anyone who does have a modicum. There are plenty of martial arts which have uniforms functionally identical to skirts. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hakama#Men.27s_hakama :
"Hakama are also regularly worn by practitioners of a variety of martial arts, such as karate, kendo, iaido, taido, aikido, ryu-te, and kyūdō."
(That's two empty-handed arts right there, which are both quite popular and common in the US.)
what's our term for 'counter-arguments which are bogus and not actually why a person disbelieves what they disbelieve'?
I suspect you are thinking of true rejection.
I really love the idea of spaced repetition, and I really love Wikipedia. I wish, however, that there was a fusion of the two spaces. Imagine surfing Wikipedia, reading an interesting fact you'd like to remember, and simply clicking a button next to it that added that fact to your daily spaced repetition learning database.
Also, while there are good spaced repetition programs/databases out there (like Anki), the databases aren't collaborative like a Wiki, and in general could be much better. Actually, collaborative abilities aside, I think even a very well kept but closed database could be quite valuable (more so than Rosetta Stone or other such software for learning a language for instance).
Tackling some of these ideas is something I'm planning on doing once I finish up my current projects, but if someone else jumps on them first, all the better.
I don't want to sound like too much of an evangelist, because I'm not amazingly skilled myself, but when I saw the heading "cheat codes" I immediately thought "lifting weights."
If you're interested in looking (conventionally) good, feeling well, and making progress in physical performance, and if you don't have any physical problems that make it impossible, free weights are sort of the "secret weapon" that most people aren't using. Quite a few people who can't lose weight (or fat) with cardio, can once they try weights (this is true of me, on a small scale.) The added advantage is that you save time. (>8 mile runs may be pleasant on occasion, but they sure do take a while.)
When you're feeling depressed for no good reason, force yourself to laugh. It triggers happiness almost as well as externally-induced laughter. Eventually, you will noticeably condition yourself to release seratonin (or endorphins, or something) every time you notice that you're seratonin-deficient.
It's been effective for me. I started it as a moody teenager and it quickly became self-perpetuating. Google suggests I'm not alone. It's got a whiff of wire-heading, I admit, but ideally you're using it to solve a brain chemistry defect, not an external problem.
Well, since you mentioned expert violinists...most people find that guitar is alarmingly easy to learn once they sit down with it. With a 1 hour lesson per week and 30 minutes of practice 3 times a week for 10 weeks, most people can get to the point where they are affirmatively entertaining -- much more fun to listen to than silence or small talk. Being able to play an instrument reasonably well is good for making friends, impressing people, expressing emotions, achieving flow, and improving self-esteem.
Unless you're a perfectionist, extremely busy, or extremely lazy, you will probably find that after the first 5 hours or so of time-investment, both the lessons and the practice can be a lot of fun -- you don't have to follow a rigid system; you can just see interesting techniques used and then copy whichever ones interest you as best you can, and music comes out.
For improving writing skills, the two most effective methods I know are:
Participate in National Novel Writing Month. The idea is to write a 50,000 word work of fiction in 30 days, without fretting over quality too much. If you do this, you will learn a lot. It's unavoidable. (Plus, you get a book with your name on it. That's a great feeling.)
Write blog entries, and post them somewhere people will see and discuss them. Less Wrong, for instance, or Hacker News. If you know you're writing for an audience, it forces you to clarify your thoughts, and put mo
Waking up: I found brute force works best - Old style alarm clock with clanging bells placed on opposite end of room. This trumped all sorts of complex maneuvers, including training self to have a fixed pattern response to an certain iPhone alarm.
Brilliant! I think we often have a hard time seeing these cheat codes. One reason for this might be the following (OK, a bit speculative, granted)
Gladwell or Taleb writes in some book that we have a gut feeling that there should be a correspondence between cause and effect: we have trouble of conceiving of significant effects (e.g. the president of the US being murdered) as having trivial or uninteresting causes (i.e. a lunatic). Instead we postulate that there must be a significant cause - e.g. a Sovjet conspiracy. Similarly, we have trouble conceving of ...
Any data on how long in advanced for spaced repetition to be effective, say if you're studying for an exam or something ?
Most things worth doing take serious, sustained effort. If you want to become an expert violinist, you're going to have to spend a lot of time practicing. If you want to write a good book, there really is no quick-and-dirty way to do it. But sustained effort is hard, and can be difficult to get rolling. Maybe there are some easier gains to be had with simple, local optimizations. Contrary to oft-repeated cached wisdom, not everything worth doing is hard. Some little things you can do are like cheat codes for the real world.
Take habits, for example: your habits are not fixed. My diet got dramatically better once I figured out how to change my own habits, and actually applied that knowledge. The general trick was to figure out a new, stable state to change my habits to, then use willpower for a week or two until I settle into that stable state. In the case of diet, a stable state was one where junk food was replaced with fruit, tea, or having a slightly more substantial meal beforehand so I wouldn't feel hungry for snacks. That's an equilibrium I can live with, long-term, without needing to worry about "falling off the wagon." Once I figured out the pattern -- work out a stable state, and force myself into it over 1-2 weeks -- I was able to improve several habits, permanently. It was amazing. Why didn't anybody tell me about this?
In education, there are similar easy wins. If you're trying to commit a lot of things to memory, there's solid evidence that spaced repetition works. If you're trying to learn from a difficult textbook, reading in multiple overlapping passes is often more time-efficient than reading through linearly. And I've personally witnessed several people academically un-cripple themselves by learning to reflexively look everything up on Wikipedia. None of this stuff is particularly hard. The problem is just that a lot of people don't know about it.
What other easy things have a high marginal return-on-effort? Feel free to include speculative ones, if they're testable.