279

LESSWRONG
LW

278
Personal Blog

9

Comic endorsing Bayesian statistics

by grouchymusicologist
6th Apr 2011
1 min read
13

9

Personal Blog

9

Comic endorsing Bayesian statistics
15Sniffnoy
2David_Gerard
1Alicorn
0Sniffnoy
11DanielLC
4bentarm
15jmmcd
4jsalvatier
11Vladimir_Nesov
0Tehom
0Pr0methean
0HonoreDB
0Psy-Kosh
New Comment
13 comments, sorted by
top scoring
Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 2:23 AM
[-]Sniffnoy14y150

Definitely editorializing on your part.

Reply
[-]David_Gerard14y20

Yep.

Reply
[-]Alicorn14y10

Definitely

95% confidence? :P

Reply
[-]Sniffnoy14y00

Well, OK, if I had to actually assess a probability I'd go with something more like 7/8 or 8/9...

Reply
[-]DanielLC14y110

And the moral of the story is to never stop playing Minecraft.

Reply
[-]bentarm14y40

You don't have to be a Bayesian to do a correction for multiple comparisons. The scientists in the comic just did their job badly.

Reply
[-]jmmcd14y150

Comic endorsing Bonferroni corrections!

Reply
[-]jsalvatier14y40

More of a critique of hypothesis testing than an endorsement of Bayes stats. It is a pretty tough criticism though.

Reply
[-]Vladimir_Nesov14y110

Come on, it's about journalists' sloppiness in understanding technical statements. What the minecraft people said was certainty correct.

Reply
[-]Tehom14y00

It's the file-drawer problem in comic form.

Reply
[-]Pr0methean11y00

Makes me wish initiatives like U of Ottawa's JI-R would turn into real journals that could reliably publish at least quarterly.

Reply
[-]HonoreDB14y00

It's an excellent comic in that you can see room for improvement in every step. With better hypothesis generation, we control the number of false positives by controlling the number of false hypotheses--maybe they should have just kept playing Minecraft?

Reply
[-]Psy-Kosh14y00

I just came here to post the same comic. :)

Reply
Moderation Log
More from grouchymusicologist
View more
Curated and popular this week
13Comments

Well, that might be editorializing on my part, but you'll see what I mean ...