LESSWRONGTags
LW

Epistemic Review

EditHistory
Discussion(0)
Help improve this page(2 flags)

Epistemic Reviews take a closer look at an existing publication – such as a book, paper or blogpost – and evaluate whether its claims are true.

Posts tagged Epistemic Review
Most Relevant
3
118What Comes After Epistemic Spot Checks?
Elizabeth
1y
9
3
99How did academia ensure papers were correct in the early 20th Century?Q
Ben Pace, LiorSuchoy
2y
Q
17
2
1342018 Review: Voting Results!
Ben Pace
1y
60
2
102What's Wrong with Social Science and How to Fix It: Reflections After Reading 2578 Papers
habryka
6mo
22
2
73Can we hold intellectuals to similar public standards as athletes?
ozziegooen
5mo
46
2
59Is this viable physics?Q
Daniel Kokotajlo, evhub
1y
Q
26
2
47Musings on LessWrong Peer Review
Raemon
3y
23
2
30Breaking Questions Down
Elizabeth
8mo
1
2
26ESC Process Notes: Detail-Focused Books
Elizabeth
1y
5
2
22Sentence by Sentence: "Why Most Published Research Findings are False"
AllAmericanBreakfast
7mo
5
2
15Epistemic Spot Check: A Guide To Better Movement (Todd Hargrove)
Elizabeth
4y
7
2
13Popular papers to be scrutinized?Q
alyosha_the_pot
1y
Q
13
1
42Epistemic Spot Check: The Dorito Effect (Mark Schatzker)
Elizabeth
2y
8
1
39Epistemic Spot Check: The Fate of Rome (Kyle Harper)
Elizabeth
2y
3
1
39How’s that Epistemic Spot Check Project Coming?
Elizabeth
1y
16
Load More (15/19)
Add Posts