LESSWRONG
LW

1834
Wikitags

Epistemic Review

Edited by Raemon, gustaf last updated 9th Oct 2025

Epistemic Reviews take a closer look at an existing publication – such as a book, paper or blogpost – and evaluate whether its claims are true. 

Alt search term: fact check.

See also: Epistemic Spot Check

Subscribe
Discussion
2
Subscribe
Discussion
2
Posts tagged Epistemic Review
3
122What Comes After Epistemic Spot Checks?
Elizabeth
6y
9
3
106What's Wrong with Social Science and How to Fix It: Reflections After Reading 2578 Papers
habryka
5y
22
3
99How did academia ensure papers were correct in the early 20th Century?
Q
Ben Pace, LiorSuchoy
7y
Q
17
3
33Epistemic Strategies of Selection Theorems
Ω
adamShimi
4y
Ω
1
2
319Epistemic Legibility
Elizabeth
4y
30
2
174Did Christopher Hitchens change his mind about waterboarding?
Isaac King
1y
24
2
160Big Mac Subsidy?
jefftk
3y
25
2
1352018 Review: Voting Results!
Ben Pace
6y
59
2
84Can we hold intellectuals to similar public standards as athletes?
ozziegooen
5y
48
2
59Is this viable physics?
Q
Daniel Kokotajlo, evhub
6y
Q
27
2
47Musings on LessWrong Peer Review
Raemon
8y
23
2
31Breaking Questions Down
Elizabeth
5y
1
2
27ESC Process Notes: Detail-Focused Books
Elizabeth
6y
5
2
22Review: Martyr Made Podcast
Elizabeth
4y
0
2
22Sentence by Sentence: "Why Most Published Research Findings are False"
DirectedEvolution
5y
5
Load More (15/27)
Add Posts