Short answer: yes.
Long answer: being romantically desirable via being hot is not the be-all and end-all. If someone is mildly attracted to you, you'll have more pleasant interactions with them. I have felt this in both directions for myself.
Then those effects percolate outwards as "status" (in the generic rationalist description of the word). If third parties see you having positive interactions with other people, they'll think more highly of you.
And also, non-autistic individuals (I mean in the actual, clinical sense of autism; the effect I'm describing is actually one of the most interesting and unique features of autism as opposed to just social awkwardness) preferentially ally themselves with people they expect to be high-status. So if you're attractive, since people (on some level which is basically instinctual) will expect you to be have more social cache with others, they'll be nicer to you even if they're not attracted to you, nor have they seen you have a series of positive interactions with people who are.
P.S. I'm unclear from the information you've given whether you actually do have high variance in attractiveness over time. E.g. a "fresh" haircut is only good if the haircut looks good on you. For men it is (famously!) often the case that their freshly-cut hair is unattractively short. I usually find 2-10 weeks post-haircut to be optimal. For clothes, do they fit you well? Do the outfits go together and complement your overall style? The variance here comes from "5-year-old T-shirt and jeans" vs "well-fitting shirt and jacket" not vs "new T-shirt and jeans".
Generally from what you've said I'd guess that you're not getting much natural variance in attractiveness.
I'm an adult man, and I've never cared much about how I appear to others. This allows me to dress for comfort and practicality, and saves me a lot of money. However, I'm basically ignoring the common wisdom that appearances matter more than you'd think. So I'm naturally wondering if I'm making a mistake. I suspect several LessWrongers find themselves in similar situations.
Roughly, the model I'm following is as follows: My situation (work, social circle, self-image) is such that nobody cares much about how I look. There is little to gain beyond a low bar, where the low bar consists of things like getting a haircut every 3 months, don't smell bad and don't have holes in your clothes that show skin.
My main evidence in support of this picture comes from my own uncontrolled daily experiment: There is a high natural variance in how good I look. Sometimes I recently had a haircut and I'm wearing nice clothes, and sometimes I'm due a haircut and wearing particularly worn clothes. So if looks mattered significantly, I should observe positive outcomes significantly correlated with appearance. However, I essentially don't. I conclude that the effect of appearances in my daily life can't be that strong.
However, I've recently started looking into the possibility of acquiring a romantic partner. And for this purpose, looks matter a lot. A life partner can be a large factor in my overall life happiness and satisfaction. So now I'm wondering if the general advice that everyone should care about appearances, is primarily motivated by this single use-case?
Here are some examples of my choosing practicality and saving money over looking good:
I am however relatively tall and fit, which might offset some of my choices above. Furthermore, I do adhere to some low bar, such as cutting my hair every ~3 months and throwing away clothes with visible holes.
There are some commonly quoted reasons for why one should care about looks:
In summary, I seem to be doing fine with my current unoptimized looks, and I see little evidence that better looks would yield better outcomes for me.
There is only one clear exception: looking good for the benefit of a romantic partner.
Dating is highly attraction-based. We evolved to select good partners, and physical attraction is one of the primary heuristics. Even after dating, a romantic partner might gain significant overall life satisfaction from me optimizing my appearance, even if I don't care myself.
I get the impression that I'm not "supposed" to care about appearances only for the sake of a romantic partner. My mother didn't sell it like that. The vibe I get is that you should do it "to become a better person" or "do it for yourself". If I'm going to change my habits and spend much more money on clothing and accessories, I would expect better responses from declaring that I'm doing these things to "better myself" than saying I'm doing them to "attract and satisfy a romantic partner".
My hypothesis is that people who internalize the belief that they care about appearances "to become a better person" on average perform better than people who explicitly optimize to attract romantic partners. Focusing directly on the goal of satisfying a romantic partner could have many pitfalls. For example, you might conclude that your romantic partner is already locked in, so you can stop trying (which would then hurt the partner). Or you might over-optimize to appear attractive to one particular partner (who seems like the one at the time), but then break up with them and be left stranded. The general advice of caring about appearances seems generally more robust than the direct policy of optimizing for partner attraction and satisfaction.
I'm interested in ways to detect the significance of my appearance outside of dating. Maybe a social experiment I could run in my daily life. It's not hard to seek out situations which highlight the importance of looks: I could partake in political debates or do stage performances. However, I'm looking for reasons to look good in my daily life, not just in contrived circumstances.
I'm aware that my circumstance is unusual in the general population. If I was a famous personality or did in person marketing, appearances would clearly matter. However, I assume that here on LessWrong there are others in similar situations to mine, where the standard justifications seem weak, for reasons described above. What do you think? Does my appearance primarily matter for romantic partners? Or am I missing something?